A
Portrait of Boston's
Tibetan Community
Text
and Photos by Robert O'Malley
Jampa Phuntsok stands at the
blackboard in the basement of Cambridge's Swedenborg Chapel. As
a group of Tibetan school children watch and listen, he instructs
them on the intricacies of reading and writing the Tibetan language.
Later in the evening, when the language lesson is over, the children
will also receive instruction in Tibetan arts and culture.
Like Boston's overseas Chinese community, Boston's
fledgling Tibetan community values its language and culture. Determined
to ensure that it is passed on to the younger generation, local
Tibetans meet at the Swedenborg Chapel on Sundays to teach their
children the language and culture of their homeland.
Before 1991, says Ngawang Jorden, a Tibetan Buddhist
lama and a graduate student in Buddhism at Harvard University,
"there were only 20 or so Tibetans" in Boston. The size of the
local Tibetan community started to grow in the early 1990s after
Massachusetts Rep. Barney Frank sponsored legislation providing
1000 special visas for Tibetans living in the exile community
in India. Under the legislation, the Tibetans received visas but
were not allowed to receive welfare or other special benefits
allowed refugees from countries such as Vietnam and Cambodia.
The Tibetans who received visas were resettled in
cluster sites, the first of which was Boston. Local Tibetans as
well as the Office of Tibet in New York, which represents the
Dalai Lama in the US, and the International Campaign for Tibet
in Washington, also contributed to the resettlement effort. Most
of the Tibetans who received visas had been living in India and
Nepal, though some had only recently left Tibet. Also aiding the
resettlement effort was the Tibetan Association of Boston which
serves as a bridge between the new immigrants and the local community.
The Tibetan community of Greater Boston now has
more than 200 people, most of whom have arrived here over the
last few years. Initially 50 visas were issued for Tibetans settling
in the Boston area, but the size of the local Tibetan community
has grown in recent years as the first group of immigrants sponsored
family members to migrate under US Immigration's family reunification
policy.
Because most of the Tibetans had been living in
India before arriving in the US, many can speak English. The children
are attending local schools and the adults have found work in
hotels, supermarkets, and construction companies. Most are living
in Somerville and Cambridge.
Tashi Lokyitsang, president of the Tibetan Association
of Boston, says the Tibetan community's adjustment to the US is
going reasonably well, though the children are still getting used
to the loss of the more closely knit Tibetan communities they
had grown accustomed to in India. In India, the Tibetans lived
in one of 32 settlements, including Dharamsala, the site of the
Dalai Lama 's exile government.
"They (the children) like it but they feel something
is missing," says Lokyitsang. who has been in the US a year now.
The biggest adjustment for the Tibetans is adapting to American
culture's emphasis on individualism. Lokyitsang observes that
Tibetans tend to put the interests of the "we" before the "I."
"Over here the self comes before the others," he
says, adding that the Tibetans believe "you cannot survive alone.
We are dependent on each other....When we pray to God we pray
for all sentient beings."
Raising children in a new culture also puts added
pressure on Tibetan parents. "We parents have a big responsibility,"
says Lokyitsang, a purchasing clerk at the Hyatt Regency Hotel
who left Tibet for India in 1959 when he was 1 year old. "The
kids can change anytime. It's very quick in the United States."
For 15-year-old Tenzin Keyson, living in America
means getting used to the way American students interact with
their teachers. "In our culture when you talk to the elders you'll
be looking down," says Keyson, who arrived here six months ago
and whose parents operate a Tibetan artifacts store in Cambridge's
Porter Square. "In India you weren't allowed to argue with the
teachers."
A student at Cambridge's Rindge and Latin High School,
Keyson feels that some American students "just don't want to respect
the teachers." While she says she enjoys being able to question
her American teachers, she believes students shouldn't abuse the
privilege.
Although most of the adults
and children in the local Tibetan community had either been born
in India or spent much of their lives there before immigrating
to America, many overseas Tibetans still dream of one day returning
to a Tibet free of Chinese control.
Whether they left Tibet not long after the Chinese
invasion of their homeland in the 1950s or after the anti-Chinese
demonstrations and subsequent crackdown against dissidents of
the late 1980s, most of the Tibetans - like the Dalai Lama - traveled
to India to escape the Chinese occupation.
Although there are intense arguments between the
Tibetans and Chinese over whether Tibet is a separate country
or part of China - a dispute on display when Tibetan critics of
Chinese President Jiang Zemin vied for sidewalk space with Jiang's
Chinese supporters during the Chinese leader's visit to Harvard
last month - the history of Tibet suggests that the only reason
Tibet is considered part of China today is because the Chinese
empire coveted it, just as Western imperialists coveted Hong Kong
and other parts of China.
A strong kingdom in its own right before it was
conquered by Genghis Khan in 1206, Tibet was eventually incorporated
into the Chinese empire in the 17th century during the Qing Dynasty.
Over the next two centuries, however, Chinese control over the
remote area gradually diminished, leaving the Buddhist kingdom
free to determine its own destiny. In 1904, the British invaded
Tibet at a time when Tibet was largely free of Chinese control.
Although an Anglo-Chinese convention of 1906 again gave Chinese
control over Tibet, Tibet regained its independence from China
and expelled Chinese officials and troops following the overthrow
of the Qing Dynasty in 1912.
In a 1914 convention attended by British, Tibetan
and Chinese representatives, tentative agreement was reached on
a convention calling for an autonomous Tibet and Chinese control
over an area known as Inner Tibet. The Chinese, however, ultimately
refused to sign the agreement, and fighting eventually broke out
between Chinese and Tibetans in 1918.
In October of 1950, the Chinese military under the
control of the Communist Party invaded Tibet, and in 1951 a treaty
was signed in which the Dalai Lama was allowed to maintain control
over domestic affairs and the Chinese Government given control
over military and foreign affairs.
Starting in 1956, however, Tibetans initiated an
uprising against the Chinese invaders that culminated in the decision
by the Dalai Lama to leave the country and create an exile government
in India. During this same period many of the Tibetans who are
today in Boston left China to join the Tibetan exile community
in India.
While most members of the
local Tibetan community left Tibet many years ago as children
or were born in the exile communities in India, Kalsang Namgyal
and his wife Chungdak left Tibet in 1990 to escape harassment
by the Chinese authorities. Namgyal, who speaks Tibetan, English,
and Mandarin, had a good job working for a government film distribution
company for 15 years before leaving Tibet.
A resident of Lhasa, Namgyal, 38, witnessed Tibetan
demonstrations against the Chinese occupation on March 5, 1988.
He said the Tibetans were demonstrating in Lhasa for a free Tibet
and the return of the Dalai Lama.
"I saw the demonstration," he said. "They (the demonstrators)
weren't doing anything." Namgyal said he saw Chinese soldiers
start shooting unarmed Tibetan demonstrators, one of whom died
before his eyes on the street that day. From 20 to 40 people were
shot by the soldiers, he says, adding that his younger brother
was jailed for 15 years following the demonstration and remains
in jail to this day. His mother and another younger brother have
also been jailed at various times by the Chinese authorities.
Namgyal, who was born on March 17, 1959, the day
the Dalai Lama left Tibet, grew up in a Tibet under Chinese control.
During the Cultural Revolution, numerous Buddhist monasteries
were destroyed by the Chinese, who considered Buddhism superstitious
and taught that pre-"liberation" Tibet was feudal and primitive.
For 15 years Namgyal worked mostly with Chinese.
"We had a very good friendship," he says, adding that some Tibetans
"are very friendly with the Chinese."
Although most Chinese would prefer to live and work
in China, the Chinese Government lures them to Tibet by providing
them with opportunities and benefits that would not be available
if they remained in China, he says.
Namgyal emphasizes - like the Dalai Lama - that
his complaint is not with the Chinese people but rather with Chinese
government policies. He and other Tibetans - as well as some Chinese
- argue that the Chinese people do not really know what to think
about the Tibetan issue and may not clearly understand it because
they have been fed government propaganda for so many years. Without
a free press or free speech, the government can make people believe
whatever it wants. Tibetans as well as some Chinese point out
that the Chinese must also contend with the human rights abuses
of the current Communist Party regime.
"The Chinese people need a good life too," Namgyal
says. "I know the Chinese Government is bad, but I don't want
to hurt the Chinese people."
In Tibet and China today, Tibetans must contend
with subtle forms of discrimination. Chinese, for example, will
sometimes insult Tibetans because they can't speak English as
well as native speakers or because their skin may be darker than
that of the Chinese. Namgyal recalls how he once entered a restaurant
in China before a group of Chinese but was seated after them because
he was an ethnic minority.
Subtle insults have also been woven into the revolutionary
logic of the Chinese Communist Party's Tibetan policy. Chinese
- and Tibetans - were taught that Tibetan society before the Chinese
"liberation" was uncivilized and that Tibetans practiced torture
and engaged in other atrocities against the less powerful in their
society. While the Dalai Lama himself has criticized some Tibetan
practices from an earlier era and vowed to make Tibet a democracy
if he returns, the Tibetans believe that the shortcomings of Tibetan
society have been grossly exaggerated by the Chinese propaganda
machine.
"When you're young you don't know if that is true,"
says Namgyal, who adds that most Tibetans at the time were afraid
to question the propaganda publicly because of the presence of
the Chinese officials and soldiers. Eventually, says Namgyal,
older people would say to him: "'That's a lie. It was never like
this.' My parents didn't tell me lies," he adds.
What worries Namgyal and other Tibetans today is
that the forced occupation of their country will lead to cultural
genocide. Like the Chinese, they say they are proud of their own
culture and want to see it survive. Namgyal and others point out
that Tibet has had its own language, its own style of clothing,
its own food, and a unique Buddhist culture.
Namgyal believes there are more Chinese than Tibetans
living in Lhasa today. In a visit to Inner Mongolia, he saw people
who claimed they were Mongolian but who could barely speak the
Mongolian language. "When I saw that I was very worried about
my Tibetan people. Soon it's going to be like that."
The arrival of the Namgyal
family and other Tibetans in the Boston area in recent years has
been " like a dream come true," for Yeshey Palsang and her family.
When her husband, Kuncho Palsang, arrived in Boston in 1965, he
was the only Tibetan living in the area.
"Sometimes I have to think to myself that this couldn't
be happening," she says. " So it's a great great benefit for my
family." The arrival of Tibetan families in recent years means
that Tibetans can create a genuine local community, she says.
In 1959, her husband escaped overland from Tibet
to India following the Chinese invasion. In India, he met former
Roxbury Latin School Headmaster Richmond Mayo-Smith and his wife,
who helped him immigrate to the US. Kuncho later returned to India
to marry Yeshey, who joined him here in 1978. Since his arrival
in 1965, Kuncho Palsang has lived and worked at Roxbury Latin
School in West Roxbury.
Perhaps the most challenging aspect of immigrating
to America for the Palsangs and other Tibetans was adjusting to
life in a fast-paced and less close-knit American society. "Fortunately
so many Americans are interested in Buddhism," says Yeshey, "So
I have a lot of friends through the Buddhist centers."
Though the local Tibetan community hasn't a temple
like many other Asian ethnic groups, most Tibetan families here
have small Buddhist altars in their homes on which they make offerings
of water, light, and food. They are also passing the religion
on to their children.
"During dinner my mom would teach us a new prayer,"
explains the Palsangs' 18-year-old daughter, Tenley, who was born
in the United States and will attend Wheaton College next year.
Tenley says she strives to incorporate the essential ideas of
Buddhism into her daily life. "It's always hard but I try to remember
to show compassion, forgiveness and patience," she says.
"You try to mingle your everyday life with the teachings,"
adds Yeshey. "For us we try to sit down and read prayers. We try
to think if what we did today was appropriate."
At the heart of Tibetan Buddhism is the concept
of compassion for the "myriad sentient beings, not just your family,"
says Yeshey. "So that helps a great deal."
She says the Dalai Lama, whom many of the local
Tibetans have met or worked for over the years, likes to say that
if you can't help someone, just be sure not to harm anyone.
Incorporating the teachings into daily life can
influence such mundane events as a chance encounter with a boorish
driver. While a person's instinct may be to "see him (the driver)
as a devil or demon," compassion allows for a moment of self-reflection
- and a question: "Maybe it's my life that's making me do this."
Subduing the ego - the sense of self as the center of life - is
central to the Buddhist teachings, says Yeshey.
Although the Tibetans were
out in force to protest during Jiang Zemin's visit to Boston last
month, many Tibetans like to emphasize that they don't blame the
Chinese people for the plight of their country. The overseas Tibetans
have in fact made alliances with members of the overseas democracy-for-China
movement, emphasizing that they are all working for the common
goal of a democratic China in which the human rights of both Chinese
and Tibetans are respected. In his trip to Boston several years
ago, the Dalai Lama met with Chinese students and emphasized the
importance of gaining support for theTibetan cause in the overseas
Chinese community.
Yeshey Palsang and others point out that the Dalai
Lama is seeking a course that takes into account the "happiness
of both countries (Tibet and China)." Rather than calling for
complete independence from China, the Dalai Lama has said he is
willing to negotiate with China to discuss a possible relationship
in which Tibetan domestic affairs would be controlled by Tibetans
while defense and international affairs would be controlled by
China.
"His holiness wants to save what's left of Tibet,"
she says, adding that a whole generation of Tibetans may be slowly
losing their Tibetan identity since China began occupying the
country in the 1950s.
"We know Tibet is not part of China, whether they
says its part of China or not" says Yeshey Palsang, who recently
traveled to Tibet with her husband and daughters to visit relatives.
Although most Tibetans would prefer complete independence
from China, members of the exile community also follow the Dalai
Lama, who has been proposing a compromise with China.
"I honestly think the Dalai Lama wants to see good
for both Tibetans and Chinese," says Jorden, who notes that some
members of the younger generation have criticized the Dalai Lama's
non-violent approach. The Dalai Lama is in the peculiar position
of being criticized by both sides - the Tibetans and the Chinese
- for his willingness to compromise to solve the problem. "The
irony is the Chinese government is not really responding to the
Dalai Lama's proposal," says Jorden.
"The problem for Tibet is not only a problem for
the Tibetans, it's a problem for the Chinese as well," he says,
adding that the Chinese are unwilling to negotiate directly with
the Dalai Lama unless he states unequivocally that Tibet has been
part of China for many centuries.
"He says he can't do that," says Jorden, who is
disturbed that many Chinese accept the Chinese government's pronouncements
on Tibet without analyzing them.
"Many of the Chinese do not hesitate to say that
Tibet is part of China without any reason," says Jorden. "But
that really bothers me."
"What I'm really suggesting to my fellow Chinese
is to at least take some kind of interest and do some research,"
he adds.
In an effort to promote democracy within the exile
community and to respond to forces in the community who have been
arguing that the old tactics have failed, the Dalai Lama recently
allowed all overseas Tibetans to vote in a referendum to guage
their opinions on Tibet's relationship with China and the future
of Tibet.
Four options were offered: complete independence;
a "middle path" in which Tibet would negotiate with China to develop
a mutually acceptable relationship; the right to self-determination
in which Tibetans would use international law to realize its goal
of controlling its own affairs; and Satyagriha, or proving the
truth, a Ghandian approach involving civil disobedience, boycotts,
and initiating activities inside China. Jorden said the result
of the referendum has not been released yet.
When he was living in Tibet, Namgyal says, he supported
complete independence from China. But he says he recently voted
for a Hong Kong-style, one-country, two-systems option because
he believes the Chinese government would be unwilling to relinquish
complete control over Tibet.
Moreover, even countries such as the US are unwilling
to recognize Tibet as an independent country, though Secretary
of State Madeleine Albright recently named Greg Craig as a "special
coordinator" of Tibetan affairs to give the Tibetan issue a higher
profile and put pressure on China to negotiate with the Dalai
Lama.
Many Tibetans, however, worry that time is running
out for one of the world's most unique cultures. If current conditions
continue unchanged, says Namgyal, the native culture of Tibet
will be further destroyed.
"That's why I changed my mind," he says,. "First,
save my Tibetan people. Save my Tibet."
|